Dados B3 › Covenants · Português

The covenant EBITDA is not the income-statement EBITDA: 453 of 820 definitions carry an adjustment no outsider can reproduce

The clause that decides whether debt accelerates is almost always written in Net Debt/EBITDA. What nobody answers with a number is whether that EBITDA is the one in the financial statements. We counted, document by document, in the indentures the regulator itself publishes.

The distribution

Documents read 1,517
Companies 236
Mention EBITDA 855
Define EBITDA in the contract 820
— only objective terms (computable) 367 45%
— with a discretionary adjustment 453 55%

Which adjustments make the figure irreproducible

AdjustmentDefinitions Share
non-recurring or extraordinary expenses28234%
non-operating expenses17822%
pro forma adjustments10513%
non-cash items8510%
items at management's discretion172%

What every definition shares

AdjustmentDefinitions Share
depreciation, amortisation or depletion80598%
financial result or interest71387%
taxes on profit43153%
equity-method result13717%
leases (IFRS 16)11314%

Depreciation and amortisation is the line we corrected in 232 EBITDAs by removing debt transaction costs wrongly filed there. quality page

What we do not do, and why

We do not say whether any company complies with its covenant. When the definition adds back “non-recurring expenses”, the figure depends on a management judgement no outsider can reproduce — that is the case in 453 of the 820 definitions. We flag, we do not rewrite.

The threshold we publish is a FLOOR

We read a Net Debt/EBITDA threshold in 471 documents. That is a floor, not a count: thresholds usually sit in a TABLE, and text extraction scrambles tables. In one indenture we checked by hand, carrying five thresholds in a table, automated reading found none.

Covenants get renegotiated

923 of the documents are amendments, and 149 companies have an amendment later than the indenture — including a bondholders' meeting changing the very definition of “Net Debt” used in the ratio. Those rows are flagged. Publishing a superseded covenant would be a wrong figure wearing a right face.

Source and how to check

Brazilian securities regulator, periodic-filings channel, category “Debenture indentures and amendments”. Public documents, with a direct link to the original on every row. We cover 236 of the 455 companies in our base — those that issued debentures since 2021. The regulator listed 0 documents and we could read 1,517: -1,517 failed to download or to yield text and became no row. The loss is stated because coverage that looks complete misleads.

lineage · reading the regulator files · transparency

Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-09-01-supressao-declarada · page generated 2026-09-08 10:36 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.

Home · Methodology · Transparency · Audit it