Dados B3 › How much it returned
How much did R$ 1,000 in FTCE11 become?
R$ 1,000 invested in FTCE11 (OPPORTUNITY FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO IMOBILIÁRIO) 5 years ago (2022-04-14) became R$ 1,024 on price alone; in the IFIX, R$ 1,394; at the Selic target, R$ 1,629 (to 2026-04-16). Distributions are NOT included here: the holder's real return is higher. Past result, no costs or taxes; not advice.
| Period | Since | FTCE11 (price) | FTCE11 (with distributions) | IFIX (price) | Selic target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr | 2025-05-15 | R$ 1,026 | — | R$ 1,144 | R$ 1,136 |
| 3 yr | 2023-05-17 | R$ 1,005 | — | R$ 1,309 | R$ 1,422 |
| 5 yr | 2022-04-14 | R$ 1,024 | — | R$ 1,394 | R$ 1,629 |
| 10 yr | 2017-03-07 | R$ 1,001 | — | R$ 1,916 | R$ 2,184 |
How it was measured
- Closing price, NOT adjusted for splits (a daily jump above 35% is flagged with *). With distributions: each cash distribution reinvested at the ex-date close; a dash means price only, because we hold this fund's distributions only for the latest months (B3 publishes the latest year) and a total for the whole period would understate it.
- The IFIX is a total return index (B3 reinvests the distributions); Selic is the Central Bank target compounded per Ibovespa session, before tax — not the CDI.
- No brokerage, no taxes.
How to cite
Dados B3, "How much did R$ 1,000 in FTCE11 become?", https://dadosb3.com/quanto-rendeu/FTCE11, data to 2026-04-16 (B3 COTAHIST prices; BCB Selic).
Full page for FTCE11 · any period, open: https://dadosb3.com/fiis/FTCE11/desempenho?de=AAAA-MM-DD · Ibovespa or Selic? · plain text for AI · distributions of the fund
Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-10-18-pl-classe-versoes · page generated 2026-10-19 10:41 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.
Sources: CVM (open data, ODbL) and B3 (COTAHIST). Not affiliated with B3 or the CVM. Not investment advice.
Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-10-18-pl-classe-versoes · page generated 2026-10-19 10:41 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.