Dados B3 › How much it returned
How much did R$ 1,000 in REIT11 become?
R$ 1,000 invested in REIT11 (SINGULARE FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO IMOBILIÁRIO - FII) 5 years ago (2021-09-20) became R$ 63 on price alone; in the IFIX, R$ 1,396; at the Selic target, R$ 1,801 (to 2026-09-04). Distributions are NOT included here: the holder's real return is higher. Past result, no costs or taxes; not advice.
| Period | Since | REIT11 (price) | REIT11 (with distributions) | IFIX (price) | Selic target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr | 2025-10-31 | R$ 743 | — | R$ 1,049 | R$ 1,120 |
| 3 yr * | 2023-09-06 | R$ 321 | — | R$ 1,170 | R$ 1,439 |
| 5 yr * | 2021-09-20 | R$ 63 | — | R$ 1,396 | R$ 1,801 |
| 10 yr * | 2016-10-18 | R$ 51 | — | R$ 2,050 | R$ 2,412 |
How it was measured
- Closing price, NOT adjusted for splits (a daily jump above 35% is flagged with *). With distributions: each cash distribution reinvested at the ex-date close; a dash means price only, because we hold this fund's distributions only for the latest months (B3 publishes the latest year) and a total for the whole period would understate it.
- The IFIX is a total return index (B3 reinvests the distributions); Selic is the Central Bank target compounded per Ibovespa session, before tax — not the CDI.
- No brokerage, no taxes.
How to cite
Dados B3, "How much did R$ 1,000 in REIT11 become?", https://dadosb3.com/quanto-rendeu/REIT11, data to 2026-09-04 (B3 COTAHIST prices; BCB Selic).
Full page for REIT11 · any period, open: https://dadosb3.com/fiis/REIT11/desempenho?de=AAAA-MM-DD · Ibovespa or Selic? · plain text for AI · distributions of the fund
Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-10-18-pl-classe-versoes · page generated 2026-10-19 10:41 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.
Sources: CVM (open data, ODbL) and B3 (COTAHIST). Not affiliated with B3 or the CVM. Not investment advice.
Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-10-18-pl-classe-versoes · page generated 2026-10-19 10:41 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.